![]() 5 Dermatoglyphic patterns of intrinsic heart diseases, leukaemia, malignant tumours, celiac or gastrointestinal illnesses, schizophrenia, and many sorts of psychological disorders have all been reported. ![]() 4 In recent years, great progress has been made in linking several types of fingerprint patterns, such as whorl, loop, and arches patterns, with various illnesses, and it has been reported in medicine as a technique of diagnosis. 3ĭermatoglyphic evaluation is a crucial tool for determining the cause of illnesses with a suspected genetic basis early on. 2 The type of fingerprints is unique and is based on the genetic marker of and individuals. In India the most punctual review of fingerprint patterns was completed by William Herschel in 1880. The epidermal edge designs were assembled into "Chakra, Shankya and Padma" which relates with the Whorl, Loop and Arch patterns. 1 In old India, edge configuration study was known as ′′Samudra Shastra". Fingerprints are distinctive to all individuals and stay unaltered over the lifetime. The term “fingerprint” refers to an impression of the epidermal ridges of the distal portion of a finger formed on any surface. Also, it might serve as effective tool in prevention of dental caries.ĭermatoglyphics is the science and specialty of surface markings of the skin particularly feet and hands. This method may be considered as a non-invasive, cost-efficient, time saving method while screening of prevalence of dental caries. Hence it may be concluded that, fingerprint pattern could indicate a person’s susceptibility to dental caries. An individual's susceptibility to dental caries increases with whorl pattern incidence and decreases with loop pattern incidence. But the arch patterns were showing an insignificant negative correlation.Ĭonclusion: An attempt to evaluate the association between fingerprint patterns and DMFT score was made in this present study. The correlation analysis revealed significant negative and positive correlation for Loop and whorl pattern respectively when compared with the DMFT score. However, the arch pattern was not showing any significant difference in both the groups. There was a significant difference in the distribution of whorl and loop pattern between caries and caries free group (p<0.05). ![]() But in caries free group the Loop pattern was more frequent (75%), followed by whorl (21%) and arch patterns (3.6%). Results: Nearly 57.5% of group 1 patients had whorl pattern in their fingers followed by Loop patterns (38.13%) and arch pattern (4.4%). These findings were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis. DMFT score and fingerprint patterns of all 10 fingers were recorded in to proforma. Materials and Methods: The present study comprised total 200 individuals (100 male and 100 females) with age of 15 to 40 years, out of which 150 subjects included in group 1(with dental caries) and 50 individuals were included in group 2(without dental caries). This study is carried out to evaluate the association between dermatoglyphic pattern and dental caries. Now it is getting identified as a useful tool in understanding the basic questions in genetics and is emerging as an independent field in dentistry as dermatoglyphics. Background: Fingerprint analysis for personal identification is well-known, as it is unique to all individuals and remains unchanged over a lifetime.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |